top of page

Author: 

Editor(s):

Updated:

ULY CLINIC

ULY CLINIC

25 Septemba 2025, 01:08:24

Hill’s sign

Hill’s sign
Hill’s sign
Hill’s sign

Hill’s sign refers to a femoral systolic pulse pressure that is 60–100 mmHg higher in the right leg than in the right arm. It is a peripheral vascular sign of severe aortic regurgitation (aortic insufficiency).


Pathophysiology

  • In aortic regurgitation, the incompetent aortic valve allows blood to flow back into the left ventricle during diastole, leading to:

    • Increased stroke volume to compensate.

    • High systolic pressure due to increased ejection.

    • Low diastolic pressure due to regurgitation.

  • The result is a widened pulse pressure, which is more pronounced in the lower extremities because of arterial amplification.

  • The difference in systolic pressure between the arm and leg becomes marked (>60 mmHg) in severe cases.


Examination Technique

  1. Position the patient supine.

  2. Use an appropriately sized cuff for both arm and thigh measurements.

  3. Measure systolic and diastolic BP in the right arm.

  4. Measure systolic and diastolic BP in the right leg (femoral artery region).

  5. Compare results:

    • A difference of >60–100 mmHg in systolic pressure between the leg and arm = positive Hill’s sign.


Clinical Features

Feature

Description

Key finding

Femoral systolic BP 60–100 mmHg higher than brachial

Associated cardiac murmur

Early diastolic, decrescendo murmur of AR

Peripheral findings

Bounding “water hammer” pulse, wide pulse pressure

Related signs of AR

Corrigan’s pulse, Quincke’s sign, Duroziez’s sign


Differential Diagnosis

Condition

Finding

Difference from Hill’s Sign

Normal physiologic difference

10–20 mmHg higher in leg

Much smaller difference than in AR

Peripheral arterial disease

Lower leg BP compared to arm

Opposite to Hill’s sign

Coarctation of aorta

Lower BP in legs than arms

Opposite gradient

Severe hypertension

High systolic pressures

Equal in arm and leg, not discrepant

Pediatric considerations

  • Rarely assessed in children; AR is uncommon in pediatrics.

  • In congenital heart disease with aortic regurgitation, Hill’s sign may still be present but is not routinely used in practice.


Geriatric considerations

  • In older patients with atherosclerosis, differences in BP between limbs may be due to arterial stiffness or occlusive disease, potentially confounding interpretation.

  • Always correlate with clinical context and echocardiography.


Limitations

  • Requires accurate cuff size and technique — errors can exaggerate or mask the difference.

  • May be absent in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease.

  • Not entirely specific — best used alongside other clinical signs and echocardiography.


Patient counseling

  • Explain that this test helps assess heart valve function.

  • Emphasize that it is a supportive sign, not a definitive diagnosis.

  • Reassure that further evaluation with echocardiography is essential to confirm severity.


Conclusion

Hill’s sign is a valuable clinical indicator of severe aortic regurgitation, identified when femoral systolic BP significantly exceeds brachial pressure. While useful at the bedside, it must be interpreted cautiously, considering potential confounders such as peripheral vascular disease.


References
  1. Babu AN, Gross CM. Peripheral signs of aortic regurgitation: historical and current perspectives. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(6):558–559.

  2. Braunwald E. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.

  3. Perloff JK. Physical Examination of the Heart and Circulation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2009.

  4. Kumar P, Clark M. Kumar and Clark’s Clinical Medicine. 10th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2020.

bottom of page